General Public Of Village Bhamraili v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6169 of 2015 ======================================================

1. General Public Of Village Bhamraili Thana Dandkhora Thana No. 52, District Katihar and many other surrounding village through Nirmal Biswas, Son of Late Jitendra Biswas, Resident of Village - Bhamraili, Bhamraili Panchayat Dandkhora, P.O. - Souria, District - katihar, Pin - 854105 .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea.

3. Collector, Katihar.

4. Additional Collector (Ceiling), Katihar.

5. S.D.O., Sadar, Katihar.

6. L.R. Dy. C. Sadar Sub Division, Katihar.

7. Circle Officer, Dandkhora Anchal Thana Dandkhora District - Katihar.

8. Civil Surgeon, Katihar.

9. Medical Officer Incharge, Dandkhora, Thana Dandkhoa, District - Katihar.

10. Abdul Wahid, Son of Late Haji Chamruddin Resident of Village - Bhamraili, Thana - Dandkhora, P.O. - Sauria, District - Katihar, Pin - 854105.

11. Bimla Devi, Wife of Late Kesho Prasad Gupta,

12. Rishideo Poddar, Son of Late Baleshwar Poddar,

13. Bhima Nand Sah, Son of Late Balgovind Sah, All resident of village - Bhamraili Thana - Dandkhora, P.O. - Sauria, District - Katihar Pin - 854105.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Krishna Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. Sinha, AAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Jai Krishna Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. D.K.Sinha, learned Additional Advocate General No. 2, appearing for the State respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6169 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016 Mr. Jai Krishna Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U