Mukesh Paswan v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7393 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2015 Thana -BELSAND District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Mukesh Paswan son of Rajo Paswan, resident of village+P.O.-Bhandari, P.S.-Belsand, Distt. Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar
2. Bihar State Electricity Board, through the Chairman Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and as a matter of fact, petitioner is not a guard of the Air Tel Company and he is in no way concerned with theft of electricity.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7393 of 2017 (4) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sitamarhi, in connection with Belsand P.S. Case no. 10 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required. (3) If after submission of chargesheet any incriminating material is found against the petitioner, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T