Vinod Kumar Singh v. The Union Of India Represented
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19940 of 2021 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Singh Son of Late Ram Prasad Singh Resident of Pali, Pareo, District- Patna, Presently residing at Hariom Nagar, House No. 718, New Mainpura, P.S. - Danapur, P.O. - Danapur Cantt, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India represented through the Engineer - in - Chief, Army HQ, PO - DHQ, Kashmir House, New Delhi - 110011.
2.
Controller of Defence Accounts, Rajendra path, Patna - 800019. 3.
Commander Works Engineers, Dipatoli, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4.
A.G.E (1), Force Station, Bihta P.O. and P.S. - Bihta, District- Patna. 5.
Station Head Quarter, Binaguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, Pin Code - 715232.
6.
The Chief Engineer, H.Q. Central Command, Lucknow, U.P., PIN - 900450/56APO.
7.
The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Dr. K. N. Singh, ASG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 21-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction from the petitioner, submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned official respondent in respect of grievance of the petitioner.
Such permission is granted.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19940 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2022 2/2 Accordingly, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach concerned official respondent in the light of the fact that the petitioner has attained age of superannuation and retired from service in the month of August, 2020. If the petitioner approaches the concerned official respondent within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order, the concerned official respondent is permitted to pass a suitable order in accordance with law insofar as M.A.C.P. benefit is concerned.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Rajiv Roy, J) GAURAV S./- U