Patna High CourtMJC/2041/2016dismissed

Rita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2041 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14161 of 2012 ====================================================== Rita Devi, Wife of Late Shyam Narain Prasad, Resident of Village- Uprora, P.O.- Maraura, P.S.- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda presently residing at 412 Late Ram Karan Paswan, Village Tineri, P.O. Nadaul, P.S. Masaurhi, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shri D.S. Gangwar, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Now Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Shri M. Ram Chandra Tuddu, Director, Primary Education, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Shri Yogesh Chandra Singh, District Education Officer, Nalanda.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda.

6. Shri Ajay B. Nayak, Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna.

7. Shri Kuldeep Kumar, The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

8. The Assistant Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

9. Anusharawan Padadhikari, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

10. Shri M.S. Tyagrajan, District Election Officer (Panchayat)-cum- District Magistrate, Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikas Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GP23 ANIL KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard both sides.

The contempt application alleges wilful/deliberate disobedience of the order dated 4.12.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14161 of 2012 (Annexure-1) whereby the District Magistrate was directed to examine the grievance and ensure payment of the ex-gratia amount in favour of the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.2041 of 2016(4) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 A show cause has been filed after service. Learned A.C. to G.P. 23 draws attention of the Court to the statement made in paragraph 4 as well as Annexure-B and submits that the order of the Court has been carried out inasmuch as the ex-gratia amount which was due and admissible has been paid to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the said contention.

The contempt application is dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U