Kumari Sandhya Suman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69015 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1515 Year-2017 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Kumari Sandhya Suman Wife of Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar R/V- VilalgeJadua, P.S.- Hajipur Town, Distt.- Vaishali and at present residing at Daughter of Anant Kumar Prasad @ Anant Prasad, Village- lawapur, Word-13, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar Son of Mangal Bhakta @ Mangal Bhagat R/VVilalge- jadua, P.S.- Hajipur Town, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nityanand, APP For O.P. No.2 :
Mr. Prakash Chandra Agrawal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. The petitioner has filed the present application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no. 2 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.03.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6106 of 2019, with certain conditions of payment of amount subject to any maintenance proceedings.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has pointed out that the subsequent stage of the case is that parties have compromised the matter finally amongst themselves and a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69015 of 2024(5) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 mutual consent divorce petition, under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, has already been filed in the Family Court, Hajipur. The matter has been heard and subsequently adjourned, granting the statutory cooling-off period to the parties.
4. In view of the aforesaid, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the anticipatory bail granted to opposite party No. 2. However, it is expected that both parties shall cooperate to bring the divorce proceedings to its logical end and in the event of any grievance, the petitioner shall have the liberty to renew his prayer for cancellation of the bail granted to opposite party no. 2.
5. The application stands disposed of.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T