Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23548/2016bail granted

Manohar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-30Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23548 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2015 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Manohar Yadav, son of Nand Lal Yadav, Resident of village- Baijupatti, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K. Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015 registered for offences under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. An allegation has been made in the First Information Report against the petitioner and one Bambam Yadav for keeping and using the stolen motorcycle. The said motorcycle was recovered from the house of Bambam Yadav who has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 23.5.2016 in Cr. Misc. No. 22198 of 2016. The order-sheet shows that the petitioner was also using the said motorcycle. The petitioner is in jail custody since 1.3.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23548 of 2016 (2) dt.30-05-2016 Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Manohar Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T