Gulshan Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19530 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2015 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Gulshan Kumar @ Golu Son of Sri Balmiki Ray, resident of village - Baro Satanpur, Police Station Barauni in the District of Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. During the course of investigation name of the petitioner has transpired.

Heard learned A.P.P. also. He has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that during investigation his name has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19530 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twentyfive thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S. Case no. 94 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required. (3) if any incriminating material comes against the petitioner during investigation, prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond. Accordingly, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T