← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59540/2025disposed

Nageshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59540 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35502 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2022 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Nageshwar Yadav S/O Raksha Yadav R/O Village - Baniya, P.S.- Gurua, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard Mr. Durgesh Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Narain, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present modification application has been filed for modifying the order 10.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35502 of 2025.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence in the bail application, the satisfaction portion as well as the P.S. Case No. have wrongly been mentioned as "learned POCSO Cum ADJ VII, Gaya in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S Case No. 247 of 2024" but in fact, it should be "Smt. Pragya Aishwarya, the Learned JMFC, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Gurua P.S Case No. 105 of 2022".

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59540 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2

4. In view of the above, let the satisfaction portion of the bail application as well as P.S Case No. be read as "Smt. Pragya Aishwarya, the Learned JMFC, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Gurua P.S Case No. 105 of 2022" in place of "learned POCSO Cum ADJ VII, Gaya in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S Case No. 247 of 2024" and let the same be also read in the order dated 10.07.2025 in paragraph nos. 2 and 6.

5. Accordingly, order dated 10.07.2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent and further two weeks' time is granted to the petitioner to furnish the bail bond in the Court below.

6. Accordingly, the present modification petition stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T