Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56924/2025bail rejected

Amresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-27Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56924 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar ====================================================== Amresh Ram S/o Virendra Ram R/o Village- Banni, P.S.- Dhansoi, DistrictBuxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha 1, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha 1, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Mritunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP representing the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, lodged on 25.05.2025 by the informant Shravan Kumar.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that upon information that Arshad Meer has kept illegal arms in his house, the place was raided, only mobile was recovered but according to him, it is kept with Dhanji Ram. Upon reaching that place, the information was given that they keep the arms in the house of this petitioner. The police thereafter raided the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56924 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 place and question, the petitioner was missing, there is recovery of the country made revolver in a room. This led to the F.I.R.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, only because of criminal antecedent, he has been implicated.

5. Learned APP on the other hand submits that not only the petitioner has criminal antecedent, has a ground criminal and on their questioning, they led the Police to this place which led to the alleged recovery.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, it would be appropriate that the petitioner seek bail, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

7. However, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks, files bail application, the court concerned shall consider the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T