Raja Kumar @ Raja Nishad @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56266 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Raja Kumar @ Raja Nishad @ Krishna Kumar aged about 24 years S/O Late Baleshwar Mahto @ Baleshwqar Nishad Resident of Village- Simariya Ghat, Bind Toli, P.S.- Chakia, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Matihani P.S Case No. 66 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4)/3(5) of BNS and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with the other co-accused persons have looted one jewelry shop and taken sone gold and silvery jewellery.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR rather his name has been figured during the confessional statement of the co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56266 of 2025(3) dt.17-10-2025 2/3 accused namely Bipin Kumar Nishad who has inimical term with the petitioner. He further submits that neither any Arms nor any looted articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 14.04.2025 having five antecedents.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR, Case diary and impugned order dated 15.07.2025, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Moreover, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No TIP has been conducted as yet by the concerned Officials. So, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, GR No. 1515 of 2025 subject to the condition that petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed by the Trial Court and petitioner shall resides within the jurisdiction of the Trial Court and the concerned Police Station

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56266 of 2025(3) dt.17-10-2025 3/3 shall verify the present address where the petitioner shall resides and he shall not move out from the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without the prior permission of the concerned Trial Court. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U