← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1223/2023bail granted

Naresh Mahto @ Ram Naresh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1223 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2022 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Naresh Mahto @ Ram Naresh Mahto Son of Late Dewan Mahto Resident of Village- Jogi Bigha Amilouna, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad(Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Same be kept on the record.

Defect, as pointed out by the office, has already been removed by filing a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 23 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1223 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case as the alleged recovery is made from the open field belonging to the joint family of the petitioner. It is alleged that 23 liters wine is recovered from the open field belonging to the joint family of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Court-II, Aurangabad in connection with Obra P.S. case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1223 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 3/3 No.347/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T