← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53869/2018bail granted

Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53869 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1929 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ======================================================

1. Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar, Son of Late Shankar Prasad,

2. Bhola Prasad, Son of Late Shankar Prasad, Both Resident of Village- Ghoraghat, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Priti Kumari, Wife of Sujeet Kumar, D/o Girdhari Prasad, Resident at Gewal Bigha, Near Munni Masjid, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53869 of 2018(3) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Gaya in connection with Complaint case No.1929 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T