Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48066/2018disposal with observation

Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48066 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2016 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Vinod Yadav Son of Ram Chandra Yadav Resident of Village-Koila Deva, P.S. Phulwariya, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhramveer, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 149 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is of commission of theft of Bolero vehicle of the informant on the point of knife and later on the said vehicle was recovered and petitioner and other accused persons were arrested.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and he has been in judicial custody since 13.06.2017 and other co-accused, who were also arrested along with petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by different coordinate Benches of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32722 of 2018 and vide order

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48066 of 2018 (3) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 dated 04.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23581 of 2018. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that there is recovery of Bolero vehicle from the petitioner and others and he is also an accused in thirteen other cases.

Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and also the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. However, once the charge is framed and the trial is commenced, the Trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail to his own satisfaction.

With the above observation, this application is disposed of (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T