Munna Chaudhary @ Kamleshwar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53201 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2017 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Munna Chaudhary @ Kamleshwar Chaudhary son of Patiram Chaudhary, resident of Village- Keshopur Bakri, P.S. Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Mr. Nilesh Kumar Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 181/2017, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act.
It is alleged in the written report that on account of land dispute, the petitioner along with other accused persons armed with different weapons arrived at the house of informant and started abusing. When the informant protested, accused persons made firing upon him. It is alleged against this petitioner that he made firing on the son of informant, namely, Raj Kumar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53201 of 2018 (3) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 Chaudhary causing firearm injury in his abdomen. Case diary has been received in this case wherein injury report of injured Raj Kumar Chaudhary is available which shows that doctor has found one wound of entry over left lumber region of abdomen of size 1⁄2" x 1⁄2" x deep into abdominal cavity. No wound of exit has been found on the person of injured. Opinion has been kept reserved with regard to nature of injury. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected at this stage. Petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months in the event no substantive progress is made in trial.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T