Shrawan Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Law And Justice Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, Bi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5291 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -314 Year- 2016 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Shrawan Kumar, Son of Late Lagan Raut,

2. Raj Kumar, Son of Late Lagan Raut.

3. Usha Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar.

4. Neelam Devi, Wife of Late Lagan Raut.

5. Pyari Devi, W/o Late Ram Briksha Raut. All resident of VillageKhairwa, Police Station and District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Secretary Law and Justice Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. They have got no criminal history. From the prosecution case it appears that petitioners have been involved in this case with an ulterior motive. As a matter of fact, complainant has married Shrawan Kumar and as such, the present case has been filed making all the family members accused in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5291 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the facts stated above, let above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi/ Special court POCSO, Sitamarhi, in connection with RunniSaidpur P.S. Case no. 314 pf 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. There are other conditions also that bailors should be local having sufficient property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T