Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15351/2017bail granted

Md. Sakeem @ Golden v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-04-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15351 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1178 Year- 2015 Thana -NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNAWADA ====================================================== Md. Sakeem @ Golden son of Md. Jaseem, resident of village- Sarmera, P.S. Sarmera, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Nikhat Praveen W/o Md. Sakeem @ Golden D/o Md. Khaleel, resident of village- Sarmera, P.S. Sarmera, District- Nalanda at present villageSarkanda, P.S. Govindpur, District- Nawada. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1178 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with his family members subjected cruelty with the complainant due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15351 of 2017 (2) dt.07-04-2017 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR (HC) 182. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint. He is husband of the complainant.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1178 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T