Ram Chandra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7200 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Chandra Sharma Son of Ramutar Sharma Resident of Madhubani Town, Mohalla- santu Nagar, ward No.3, Police Station - Madhubani , district Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Madhubani

5. Jatta Shankar Jha, the Executive Officer-cum-Junior Engineer, Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-5 For the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5: Mr. Purushottam Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. P. K. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No.5, appearing for the State respondents. Heard also Mr. Purushottam Jha, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

After some arguments, Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

Patna High Court CWJC No.7200 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016 2/2 in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U