Pankaj Kumar Choudhary @ Chhotu Choudhary @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12580 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2014 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Pankaj Kumar Choudhary @ Chhotu Choudhary @ Chhotu Son of Late Umesh Choudhary, Resident of Village-Adaraha, Police Station Kishanpur, District-Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 195 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 341, 342, 323, 332, 353, 380, 308, 427, 452, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is named in the First Informant Report, however no specific allegation of overt act has been attributed against him, moreover the Police after investigation submitted the Final Form not finding the case true against him, however learned court below differing with the said Final Form, took cognizance against him and the present case is out and out a false and concocted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12580 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 one.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

and further subject to that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court and the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.