← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22325/2015bail granted

Nathuni Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-29Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22325 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2001 Thana -MALI District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Nathuni Mistri S/o Late Jagdish Mistri R/o Village Itkhoria Tola, Bhuyia Bigha, P.S. Madanpur, in the District of Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr.Panday(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named but in course of investigation, his name came in this case and accordingly, in the year, 2006, the I.O. filed a requisition before the concerned court but petitioner could not be remanded in this case and subsequently, on 26-032012, he was remanded in the present case, which has been registered for the occurrence, taken place in the year, 2001. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and moreover, having more or less similar allegation, some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail.

Accordingly, petitioner named above, is directed to be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22325 of 2015 (5) dt.29-10-2015 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 18 of 2001 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 49 of 2012/84 of 2013 to the satisfaction of Ad hoc learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Aurangabad subject to condition that the petitioner shall attend the trial court, in person on each and every date for a period of one year or till conclusion of his trial, whichever is earlier and if, he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) A.K.V./- U T