Shivji Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68532 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2021 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

SHIVJI SINGH Son of Late Jai Shree Singh @ Late Jayanti Singh Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.S.- Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.), District- Siwan, Bihar. 2.

Arvind Singh @ Arbind Kumar Singh Son of Shivji Singh Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.S.- Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.), District- Siwan, Bihar. 3.

Adarsh Kumar @ Tufani Son of Shivji Singh Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.S.- Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.), District- Siwan, Bihar. 4.

Ramawati Devi Wife of Shivji Singh Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.S.- Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.), District- Siwan, Bihar. 5.

Rubi Kumari Daughter of Shivji Singh Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.S.- Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.), District- Siwan, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2022 At the outset of argument learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition of petitioner Nos.1, 2 and.3.

Prayer is allowed.

This anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner Nos.1, 2 and 3.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners No. 4 and 5 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, petitioners No.4 and 5

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68532 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2022 2/2 are alleged to have snatched gold ornaments from the daughter of informant.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and they are no way concerned with the alleged recovery. It is submitted that FIR was lodged after 19 days of occurrence. Petitioners are ladies and they have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioners and delayed lodging of the FIR, let the petitioners No. 4 and 5, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Siwan in connection with Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.) PS case No.191/2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T