Ravi Giri @ Ravi Kishor Giri @ Ravi Kisan Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ravi Giri @ Ravi Kishor Giri @ Ravi Kisan Giri, aged about 18 years, (M) Son of Manoj Giri, resident of Village- Ganga Pipra, P.S.- Paharpur, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons, with an intention to kill, had assaulted the son of the informant causing injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Specific allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55753 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 assault is against co-accused Shashi Mishra. There is no injury report on record to substantiate the allegation of assault. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the material, which has been mentioned in the impugned order dated 16.07.2025 that the sole ground of rejection of bail is that the prosecution failed to produce the injury report. Learned District Court is directed to obtain injury report from the Superintendent/ In-charge Medical Officer, with respect to son of the informant, namely, Dilip Kumar, who was treated at Sadar Hospital, Motihari.

7. If the injury sustained by the son of the informant, namely, Dilip Kumar, found to be simple in nature, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55753 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

9. In case, the Superintendent/ In-charge Medical Officer concerned fails to submit report, learned District Court may direct the Superintendent of Police, Motihari to take action against him.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent/ In-charge Medical Officer, Motihari.

11. Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T