← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1467/2014disposed

Amrit Raj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-03Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1467 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14398 of 2013 ====================================================== Amrit Raj Son of Vibhishan Yadav Resident of Village - Araria, Post Office - Balaha, Police Station - Parbatta, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sunit Kumar, Son of name not known, the Chairman, Central Selection Board (Sipahi Bharti), Bihar, Patna.

3. Sunit Kumar, Son of name not known, the Chairman, Central Selection Board (Sipahi Bharti), Computer Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bihar, Patna.

4. Bimal Kumar, Son of name not known, the Secretary, Central Selection Board (Sipahi Bharti), Bihar, Patna.

5. Upendra Kumar Singh, Son of name not known, the Superintendent of Police, Rail, Patna.

6. Sri Janardan Kumar, Son of name not known, the Sub-divisional Officer, Gogri in the district of Khagaria.

7. Sri Shailendra Kumar, Son of name not known, the Circle Officer, Parbatta in the district of Khagaria.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

AC to G.P.-4 Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12.

03-04-2019 Sri Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2 to 4 submits that the order of the writ court has already been complied with in its letter and spirit and this fact has been stated in 4th supplementary show cause filed on 18th October, 2017. This submission was made in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader - 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has also not

Patna High Court MJC No.1467 of 2014(12) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 disputed the fact regarding compliance of the order of the writ court.

In view of facts and circumstances, there is no need to further proceed with the matter.

The contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U