← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60362/2025bail granted

Afjal Ansari @ Abjal Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60362 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== Afjal Ansari @ Abjal Ansari S/o- Banaras Ansari @ Banarasi Ansari VillagePhatehpur Phaga Ps- Bandua Kurwa Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Malendu For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 109/2025 dated 30.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(4) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, two unknown miscreants stopped the motorcycle of the informant and when the informant tried to escape two other unknown miscreants coming from behind on bike stopped the informant and snatched his bag and purse containing Rs. 500, bike, two tabs, a mobile phone and two biometric machines and when the informant objected, then all the four unknown miscreants threatened the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60362 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 Subodh Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No TIP has been conducted by the prosecution. The petitioner has two criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. As per the impugned order, the petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Banka in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 109/2025, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T