← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21718/2015rejected

Chandra Kishore Poddar @ Chano Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-08Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21718 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2015 Thana -PURNEA SADAR MUFASSIL DistrictPURNIA ======================================================

1. Chandra Kishore Poddar @ Chano Poddar Son of Late Chaitu Poddar resident of village - Bhatgama, P.S. Sadar Mufassil Ranipatra, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 08-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sadar ( Mufassil) P.S. case no. 98 of 2015, registered under Sections 323,341,324 354,379,307/34 of the IPC. The allegation is that the informant is the neighbour of the petitioner. Her husband had gone to Delhi in connection with job. It is alleged that while she was inside the house the petitioner entered into the room and tried to molest her inasmuch as she was disrobed. The wife and daughter of the petitioner also came there and assaulted her on eye by iron rod. Contention of the petitioner is that due to land dispute and particularly flow of drain, there has been dispute as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21718 of 2015 (2) dt.08-07-2015 2/2 earlier to this the father-in-law of the informant as well as father of the petitioner had purchased certain land. The wife and the daughter of the petitioner have been released on anticipatory bail. Learned APP, on the other hand submitted that in absence of husband petitioner ventured to molest the informant. Taking into account the allegations and the materials reflected from the records, I am not persuaded to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. Let the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail before the learned Court below. In that event the Court below shall consider and dispose of the same on its own merit and pass appropriate orders uninfluenced by the present order. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T