Jay Krishan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15051 of 2022 ====================================================== Jay Krishan Prasad Son of Late Ganga Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village - Pauhaddi Bela, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fishery Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Fisheries, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5.

The Additional Collector, Darbhanga.

6.

The District Fisheries Officer cum Executive Officer, Fisheries, Darbhanga. 7.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Biraul, Darbhanga. 8.

The Survey Settlement Officer, Darbhanga.

9.

The Circle Officer, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga.

10.

Rakesh Ratan Son of Jay Krishan Prasad, Resident of Village - Pauhaddi Bela, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. 11.

Rajesh Ratan Son of Jay Krishan Prasad Resident of Village - Pauhaddi Bela, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. 12.

Rajeev Ratan Son of Jay Krishan Prasad, Resident of Village - Pauhaddi Bela, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. 13.

Srinath Prasad, Son of Late Yadu Nandan Prasad, Resident of Village - Pauhaddi Bela, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. 14.

Baidyanath Mukhiya, Member of Management Committee, Ghanshyampur Block, Fisheries Co-operative Society, Resident of Village - Maswari, P.O. Palli, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15051 of 2022(3) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to the petitioner to move an injunction petition in the Title Suit No. 24 of 2013, if so advised.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U