← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11257/2016disposed

Parvin Kumar Bhatri And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-05Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.11257 of 2016 (2) dt.05-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11257 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Parvin Kumar Bharti son of Late Brahamdeo Prasad Yadav, resident of Village Bishnupur, P.S. Sadar District Begusarai.

2. Deepak Sarwakar son of Sri Ram Balak Poddar resident of MohallaWard No.35, Chitragupt Nagar Pokariya, P.S. Sadar District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources,Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Regional Dy. Director of Education, Munger Division, Munger.

5. The District Education Officer, Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag11- Ashok Kumar Kesari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05.09.2017 Heard.

The grievance of the petitioners is that they were transferred by the competent authority violating the teachers promotion rule, 2011 and notification vide memo no. 571 dated 24.8.2012 and memo no. 240 dated 19.2.2014.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already joined at their new place of posting and they have raised their grievance before the competent authority but up till now, their

Patna High Court CWJC No.11257 of 2016 (2) dt.05-09-2017 grievance has not been redressed.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition stands disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to raise their grievance before respondent no.4 within six weeks by filing fresh representation and if the petitioners do so, respondent no.4 shall dispose of representation petition within six weeks from the date of its filing in accordance with rule and law. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) U