Tinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61204 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2017 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Tinku Kumar, Son of Late Ashok Sao @ Ashok Sah, Resident of VillageDilawarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2017 in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No.482 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 401 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries were not from the possession of the petitioner but he is said to have been fleeing away from the place where the motorcycle was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that considering the period of custody, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, let the petitioner, above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61204 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No.482 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T