Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56543/2025dismissed

Bablu Kumar @ Mukesh @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-13Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56543 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2023 Thana- Rampur Chauram District- Arwal ====================================================== Bablu Kumar @ Mukesh @ Mukesh Kumar son of Late Surendra Sharma Village- Kandap, Ps- Gaurichak, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 69 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-468, 471, 401, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections-25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, on the tip off, the informant having constituted a team, started to check the vehicles and in that course, a motorcycle was intercepted on which, three persons were seated. It came to light that the miscreants are running the motorcycle by changing the number plate. The petitioner is said to have been arrested with stolen motorcycle

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56543 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 and illegal pistol as well as the cartridge.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 17-07-2023, to which, the learned APP Mr. Shailendra Kumar replied that the entire prosecution witnesses have been examined and now, only two official witnesses are left to be examined. It has further been submitted that a petition under the provision of 311 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the prosecution and that is why, the trial has not been concluded. It has also been submitted that the petitioner has 10 criminal antecedents in his credit.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. It appears that the trial is at the verge of conclusion.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, presently I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T