Ramdhani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56333 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Ramdhani Yadav son of Bali Yadav 2.

Prabhu Yadav son of Bali Yadav Both are resident of Village -Degma PS -Roh, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 122/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2) and 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners with a common intention to kill assaulted the informant and his father and mother, causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56333 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute. There is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the selfdefence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his father and mother without intention.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his father and mother without intention, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioners above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56333 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 122/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T