← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58631/2025allowed

Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-27Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58631 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2023 Thana- Arwal District- Arwal ====================================================== Bablu Kumar S/o- Late Surendra Sharma R/O- Kandap PS- Garichak, DistPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Nityanand Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 319 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 353/34, 307/34, 401/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the police was checking the vehicles, four bikers on two bikes were intercepted, they started fleeing away. Two person were apprehended. It is alleged that two persons managed to escape. The name of this petitioner was disclosed by the apprehended persons.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58631 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner's name has been surfaced in the statement of the co-accused person. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 17.08.2023.

5. The learned APP for the State has conceded to the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that except the criminal antecedents, there is no direct evidence against the petitioner. Petitioner is having criminal antecedent of nine cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st Class, Arwal, in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 319 of 2023.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T