Golu Kumar @ Golu Kumar Bind @ Golu Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56282 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2024 Thana- Chakia District- Begusarai ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Golu Kumar Bind @ Golu Bind Son of Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Mahto Village- Chamtha, Diyara, Ward no 3, PS- Bachhwara, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surya Narayan Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 448 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with one another co-accused forcibly entered into the house of the informant and fired on the head of his daughter due to which she died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and informant is not the actual eye witness. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56282 of 2025(3) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 that, as a matter of fact, a heated exchange took place between the daughter of the informant and the co-accused, Mithun Kumar and the petitioner has unnecessarily been dragged in the present case and is languishing in custody since 26.02.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that there is direct allegation of firing upon the petitioner causing death of the informant's daughter as also the fact that he has twelve criminal antecedents, he does not deserve the privilege of bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is direct allegation of firing upon the daughter of the informant causing her death, coupled with the fact that the firearms were recovered from him on the spot and there are as many as twelve criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T