Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.512 of 2015 ====================================================== Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jainendra Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Considering the period of custody and that the petitioner has fair antecedent as also his uncle undertakes responsibility, let the Petitioner, above named, be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 101 of 2014 subject to the conditions: That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner
is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Under the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Head Priest of Ashok Dham Mandir, Surajgarha Lakhsarai, within fifteen days of his release from jail custody on provisional bail for a period of six months and file a certificate about the same in the court below within the stipulated time. In case, the petitioner fails to file certificate about reporting to the Head Priest within two weeks of his release from jail
custody, notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of bail. During the period of six months, the petitioner is expected to engage himself in fruitful activities under the guidance of the Head Priest, of the aforesaid temple, and at the end of the six months, the petitioner will be required to file a certificate of his conduct in the court below granted by the Head Priest. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T