← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7970/2017rejected

Arjun Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7970 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2015 Thana -PURAINI District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Arjun Sahani, Son of Satan Sahani, Resident of village - Puraini, P.S. Puraini, District - Madhepura .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

In this application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 353, 379, 332, 333, 427, 504 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other five accused persons attacked on the police personnel causing injuries to police personnel. Earlier, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner and others has been rejected vide Cr. Misc. no. 43229 of 2016 dated 06.10.2016 and now, the petitioner again has come to review that order on the ground that against the petitioner, there is no specific allegation. After supervision, the Dy. Superintendent of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7970 of 2017 (3) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 Police has found no case under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code which was confirmed by Superintendent of Police, Madhepura and as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for pre-arrest bail by submitting that there is no fresh ground for re-consideration of pre-arrest bail as earlier, this prayer has already been rejected jointly with other accused persons. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider the grant of privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) rinkee/- U T