Patna High CourtCWJC/11603/2016disposed

Upendra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.11603 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11603 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Upendra Kumar son of late Jagarnath Singh resident of village - New Area Jogia Bagicha, P.S. - Civil Line Gaya, P.O. & Distt. - Gaya.

2. Md. Parwez Imam son of Late Imamuddin resident of village - Bichli Mohalla, P.O. - P.S. & Distt. - Jehanabad.

3. Shiv Kumar son of late Bal Kishun Rai R/o Brahmni Ghat, P.O. - Chand Chaura, P.S. - Vishnupad, Distt. - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Secretary, Rural Work Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Additional Secretary, Rural Work Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Patna.

7. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Patna.

8. The Chief Engineer-I, Rural Work Department, Patna.

9. The Chief Engineer (South), Road Construction Department, Traffic, Patna.

10. Superintending Engineer Magadh, Road Circle, Gaya.

11. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Work Department, Gaya.

12. The Executive Engineer, (Works Division), Rural Work Department, Nawada, Tekari.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar Gupta, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, S.C.25 Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, A.C. to S.C.4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioners.

Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, learned A.C. to S.C.4 informs that the petitioners has already joined on the transferred place of posting as admitted by them in paragraph 4 of the writ petition. In that view of the matter, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Bibhash/- (Jyoti Saran, J) U