Surendra Vind @ Surendra Prasad @ Surendra Bind v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31474 of 2016 (2) dt.08-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31474 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -438 Year- 2015 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ====================================================== Surendra Vind @ Surendra Prasad @ Surendra Bind son of Babu Lal Bind @ Babu Lal Jamadar, resident of Village- Noni, Police Station- Tekari, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 135 of the Electricity Act registered in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 438 of 2015.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that apart from 21 meters of PVC wire, no other articles have been seized. The seizure list has been sent to the police station belatedly. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the order passed by this Court at Annexure-2.

4. Learned counsel for the South Bihar Power Distribution Company appears and has been heard.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31474 of 2016 (2) dt.08-08-2016

5. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Electricity), Magadh Area, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 438 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to further condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the amount of loss "Rs. 52,144/-" said to have been caused. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T