Dr. Sulochana Kumari v. Dr Priya Ranjan Bhashkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1946 of 2015 In Matrimonial Reference No. 355 of 2014 ====================================================== Dr. Sulochana Kumari Wife of Sri Priya Ranjan Bhashkar, D/o Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Yadav, resident of village - Harischandra Pur, P.S. - Jalalgarh, District - Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

Dr Priya Ranjan Bhashkar Son of Amol Ray, residing at Mahdepura, Om Bhawan, Singheshwar Road, Ward No. 01, Madhepura, P.S. - Madhepura, District - Madhepura.

.... .... Opp. Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Tuhin Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

07-03-2017 Sri Durgesh Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the matrimonial case was sought for transfer mainly on the ground that the learned Principal Judge was prejudiced. However, Sri Tuhin Shankar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party/husband informs that the concerned Judge, against whom the petitioner has made allegation, has already been superannuated in the year 2015 itself.

Considering the fact that the ground for transfer has already come to an end, there is no reason to pass further order. The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T