Umakant Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17728 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Umakant Bhagat .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shankar Ganguli For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 81 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 63/65 of the Copy Right and Section 103/104 of the Trade Mark Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he is violated various sections of the IPC as well as under sections 63, 65, 103 and 104 of the Copy Right and Trade Mark Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing available on record to show complicity of the petitioner. No offence is made out against the petitioner under the aforesaid act. No offence against the petitioner will be made under section 420 and 406 of the IPC.

Heard learned A.P.P.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17728 of 2017 (2) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the submission made above and also the facts there is no offence of trade mark shown with the FIR, let the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 81 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ravi/- U T