Dilip Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65587 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2018 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== Dilip Verma, S/o Late Hari Kishun Verma, R/o Village- Rampur Saraiya, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 07-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as well as counsel for the Informant. Petitioner seeks bail in Darauli P.S. Case No.139 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B/34 Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is husband of the deceased.

It is alleged in the written report that daughter of the informant was married with this petitioner. He was making demand of Wagon-R car. It is alleged that this petitioner and his other family members has killed his daughter on 28.06.2018 at 10.00 PM in the night.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation of assault or bad behaviour against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65587 of 2018(3) dt.07-12-2018 2/2 petitioner with the daughter of the informant. It is submitted that postmortem was done and cause of death was shock due to haemorrhage caused by uterine rupture.

Postmortem Report is enclosed as Annexure-2, wherein, doctor has opined that cause of death was shock due to haemorrhage caused by uterine rupture. There is no mention that any injury either external or internal was found on the person of the deceased.

Petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2018.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No.139 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T