Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33231/2016bail granted

Shailendra Kumar @ Shailendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33231 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -SACHIWALAYA District- PATNA ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar @ Shailendra Kumar Singh, son of Ramdeo Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Madanpur, P.S. Ekangar Sarai, District: Nalanda .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2016 in connection with Sachiwalya P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Kalyan Kumar @ Pappu. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Raghwendra Narayan Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna in connection with Sachiwalya P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33231 of 2016 (2) dt.23-08-2016 offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T