Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24032 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -617 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH KUMAR SONI S/o Baidyanath Sah R/o Village - Pataili, P.S. Ojiarpur, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rubi Kumari W/o Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Soni R/village - Pataili, P.S. - Ojiarpur District - Samastipur At present D/o Arjun Sah, R/village - Chimnapur, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

Vide order dated, 06.09.2017, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna but as per the report of the mediator, the mediation has failed. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24032 of 2017 (5) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and counsel for the O.P.No.2, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with C.R. No. 617 of 2016, Tr. No.2534 of 2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T