Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61014 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar Son of Late Jayram Chauhan R/O Village- Diha, P.S - Tharthari, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against this petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person opened the bank account fraudulently by forging the documents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that seized Aadhaar Card and PAN Card belong to the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61014 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/2 petitioner has been transpired only on the basis of suspicion and there is no material against the petitioner and the entire prosecution story is false and concocted. Learned counsel further submitted that whatever the alleged articles have been recovered from the petitioner do not support the allegation of cheating or fraud committed by the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T