Amresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58379 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Amresh Kumar S/o Godhan Ram Village- Pachaswa, Ps- Sasaram (M), DistRohtas 2.

Amit Kumar @ Abhijeet Kumar S/o Shiv Parsan Ram @ Shiv Prasan Kumar @ Shiv Parshan Ram Village- Pachaswa, Ps- Sasaram (M), DistRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 281, 326(f) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other has assaulted the informant and others.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58379 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. It has also been submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. From perusal of the order of the trial court, it also transpires that the nature of injury is not disclosed. It is further submitted that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 12.06.2025

5. Learned APP for the State has conceded to the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T