Parbati Kumari @ Parwati Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59673 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- Sinha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Parbati Kumari @ Parwati Kumari D/o- Mahesh Sah @ Mahesh Shah Village- Porhan(Porha), P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur 2.

Pinki Kumari D/o- Mahesh Sah @ Mahesh Shah Village- Porhan(Porha), P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur 3.

Rinku Devi D/o- Mahesh Sah @ Mahesh Shah Village- Porhan(Porha), P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur 4.

Fula Devi W/o- Mahesh Sah @ Mahesh Shah Village- Porhan(Porha), P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur 5.

Soni Devi W/o- Manjhi Sah @ Manjhi Shah Village- Porhan(Porha), P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv., Ms. Priya Kumari, Adv. & Ms. Saheeba Naz, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant was married to co-accused Sohan Sah in the year 2019 and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the accused persons for dowry and lastly on 05.06.2025, the accused persons killed the daughter of informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59673 of 2025(3) dt.08-10-2025 2/2

4. Petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3 are sisters-in-law (uun), petitioner no. 4 is mother-in-law (lkl) and petitioner no. 5 is sister-in-law (xksruh) of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody, as informed by learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. Other three co-accused persons have already been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 08.09.2025 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 60533 of 2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sinha P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T