Patna High CourtCR. REV./1117/2006dismissed

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-23Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.1117 of 2006 Arising Out of Baroon PS.Case No.6 Year- 1990 District- AURANGABAD =========================================================== Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Singh, son of Alakhdeo Singh, resident of village Deyalpur, P.S. Baroon, Distt. Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Binod Singh

3. Krishna Singh Both sons of late Ramrekha Singh

4. Suresh Singh, son of late Dukhan Singh

5. Vijay Singh

6. Mirtunjay Singh

7. Sanjay Singh All sons of late Mathura Singh 8.

Shailendra Singh, son of Bindeshwar Singh 9.

Devendra Singh, son of Govind Singh

10. Binda Singh, son of late Chadhuary Singh

11. Bharat Tiwari, son of late Mangal Tiwary

12. Umesh Tiwari, son of Naresh Tiwari All resident of village Deyal, P.S. Baroon, Distt. Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamteshwar Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shiva Shankar Pd. Singh, Adv.

For the State : Mr. A.P.P. For the Opposite Parties No. : Mr. Suraj Deo Singh, Adv. 5 to 9, 2 to 4 and 10 to 12 Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks revision of the Judgment of acquittal of the Opposite Parties passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. III, Aurangabad, in Sessions Trial No. 406 of 1990/102 of 2002.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1117 of 2006 dt.23-02-2016 2/2 Having gone through the impugned Judgment, I do not find any reason for interference and, hence, the revision application stands dismissed.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T