Saroj Gond @ Saroj Kumar Gond v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56723 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Saroj Gond @ Saroj Kumar Gond S/o Late Lakshman Gond Resident of Village- Fazilpur, P.S.- Sasaram (Muffasil). District- Rohtas At Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 337, 332, 353, 427 of Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
As per allegation, a total of 285.48 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from a Scorpio bearing Registration No. BR-02X-1187.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
2/4 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been languishing in jail since 02.04.2022.
It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that the petitioner has never moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail or regular bail in. It has further been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the petition that the petitioner has been made accused in one more case, Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2019 in which he is on bail.
However, the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Exclusive Special Excise Court No.2 -cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at
3/4 Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required.
(iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has criminal antecedent other than the disclosed one, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same. (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
4/4 below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
The application stands allowed accordingly.
The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T