Manish Kumar @ Manish Das @ Manish Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56523 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2020 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Manish Das @ Manish Ram S/o Ramchandra Ram Resident of Village - Barauni, Flag (Barauni - 1), P.S. - Teghra, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020 dated 05.04.2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased, in the FIR, there is the same allegation against this petitioner as well as his father and mother namely, Yogendra Das and Meena Devi who have already been granted anticipatory bail by the then learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.11.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1152 of 2021 and the petitioner was out of the State at the relevant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56523 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 time, due to which he was chargesheeted showing as an absconder, but he never intentionally avoided his appearance before the police, later, the petitioner was taken into custody on 20.02.2025 and since then he has been languishing in jail and against him, the investigation has already been completed. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner's trial has started and the charges have been framed upon the petitioner.
4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and mainly the facts that two similarly situated co-accused persons mentioned above are already on bail, against this petitioner, there is no specific allegation in the FIR and against him, the investigation has been completed, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves to the relief of bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020. (Shailendra Singh, J) maynaz/- U T