Anwar Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23258 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -301 Year- 2016 Thana -BAHADURPUR District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Anwar Hussain Son of Late Nazir Hussain resident of Village - Pansiha, P.S. - Bahadurpur (Pator O.P.) District Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 301 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 380, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, the brother of the Informant and his wife entered into the house and started hurling abuses and also assaulted the Informant. When she raised alarm, the villagers came and they have taken her from the house and saved her life. An allegation has been made against the petitioners that they have taken away Rs. 15,00,000/- as also ornaments with them. It appears that there is basically a family dispute.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23258 of 2017 (4) dt.22-08-2017 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Anwar Hussain, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 301 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T