Vinod Mali @ Vinod Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68472 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Gopalganj ====================================================== VINOD MALI @ VINOD PRASAD S/o Late Rajbanshi Mali R/o villageKangopi, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 325, 354 and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of misbehave and try to outrage the modesty of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is an old man retired from Railway. He further submits that it is necessary to point out that husband of the informant (son of petitioner) is in private service as such, unable to fulfill the high expectation of the informant; as a result, they quarrel with each other (informant and her husband) and the informant is demanding total amount obtained by the petitioner under his post retirement benefit,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68472 of 2021(3) dt.22-08-2022 2/2 however, considering his own secured life, petitioner is not ready to give his hard earned amount of post retirement benefit to the informant and she was giving threatening from long back of implicating him in a false case to put pressure upon him. He further submits that often the informant lives in her Naiher house and the injury report shows that the injuries are simple in nature.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Mahila P.S. Case No. 05 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U