Sunil Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23312 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1332 Year- 2015 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Sunil Ram, son of Suresh Ram, Resident of Village- Dhanushi, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rina Devi, Wife of Sunil Ram, D/o Nagendra Ram, Resident of VillageDhanushi, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi, At present resident of Village- Olipur, P.S.- Belsand, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B. Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Complaint Case N0. C-1/1332/2015, disclosing offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is the husband of Opposite party No.2.

It has been stated in paragraph 14 of the application that the petitioner is ready to keep the Opposite party NO.2 with full love and dignity.

It is evident from the materials on record that matrimonial discord between them is the root cause for registration of the First Information Report. No purpose will

be served, if the petitioner is taken into custody. It is submitted that the petitioner shall present himself before the police as and when required and there is no chance that he will tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses.

Considering the nature of dispute involved and the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, this application is allowed.

Let the petitioner above-named in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Sitamarhi in Complaint Case No. C11332/2015, trial No. 2484 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U