← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./173/2021dismiss for nonprosecution

Sunita Devi, v. The Union Of India,

2025-09-03Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.173 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8307 of 2021 ====================================================== Sunita Devi, Wife of Late Dileshwar (Ex.Tech-III/SSE/TRD/GJD), Resident of Village and P.O. - Ambatri, Police Station- Mohanpur, District - Gaya (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur.

2.

The Chief Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Hazipur. 3.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Dhanbad Division, P.O. Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad.

4.

The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Dhanbad Division, East Central Railway, P.O. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad.

5.

The Station Superintendent, Gajhandi Railway Station, P.O.- Gajhandi, District - Kodarma.

6.

Pawan Kumar, Son of Late Girdhari (Late Dileshwar Yadav), Resident of Village - Manjhla Khurd, P.O. - Dumari Chatti, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the UoI :

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Senior Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 03-09-2025 No one appears for the petitioner.

2 Despite four weeks time granted to the petitioner on 07.03.2025 to remove the defects, the defects have not been removed.

3. At the same time, no one is putting appearance on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court has reasons to

Patna High Court C. REV. No.173 of 2021(4) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 believe that the petitioner has lost interest in this case and is not willing to pursue the matter.

4. Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, learned Senior Counsel for the Union of India is present.

5. In the circumstances, this application is dismissed in want of prosecution.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) lekhi/- U